For more exacting work, the use of a macro rail to make incremental changes in the distance between the camera and subject can give better results than in-camera focus bracketing like "focus shift" in the Z-series. The answer has much to do with your subject matter and shooting conditions. I had to copy and paste metadata back into the above JPG (using IMatch 2019) and reload it here to preserve shooting information.Īre there other options I should be looking at? Ps - I find Photoshop's deletion of metadata when exporting images annoying. Given that I already have and use qDSLRDashboard with my Android Pixel 2, is there any reason to get Helicon Focus Remote? Are there other options I should be looking at? When I went to their website, I saw that that they also offer Remote, a tethered shooting solution. It was, as expected, somewhat slow with a 49 image NEF stack, and reasonably good despite a few oddities that might have been due to my Z6 stacking settings (probably should have included more 'far' shots that I deleted before further processing and a few closer shots.įrom my reading, it appears that Helicon Focus would be a better tool for macro focus stacking. I used Photoshop CC 2019 for my first test, using minimal user input/control. Given that it's currently 12 F/-11 C here, I decided to shoot indoors (just a test, not a serious composition!). It seems very useful despite some learning curve about setting optimal stack parameters. I finally got around to initial testing of focus stacking with my Z6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |